Important

NOTICE

JockSpank is on the move, due to Bloggers change to their rules in relation to adult blogs, introduced many years after JockSpank was created and built up to what it is today, we are in the process of moving to a new site at

http://jock-spank.com/

We hope that you will follow us there and continue to enjoy the Spanking fun





Links are provided for the use of visitors and out of respect for the Intellectual property rights of those who create the material we post.

We have always sought to comply with Bloggers terms of service, and have acted in good faith at all times ​

Note to Blogger: If you have received a complaint about this blog, please contact the Blog owner and check the unapproved pending comments in order to gain context on this matter. Thank you

Friday, 11 November 2016

Sting: Angry Dads 12 (Part 1)


 

Another episode following some of those wayward lads intent on testing the good patience of their guardians. Two more boys are caught out, up to no good but the firm hand of discipline is waiting, poised to to put an end to their misbehaviour.

Firstly Michael (new StingLad Chris Jansen) who can't be bother to go to College, even though his Dad is paying a lot to make sure he re takes the exams he failed so miserably to pass the first time round. He is caught out on a routine visit to the hardware store. Being there is not where he should be and he knows it! Taken by the scruff of the neck he is marched home.
 
 
His luck has run out, warnings have gone unheeded, this time he know its going to be a good spanking, nothingness and almost certainly on the bare bottom. 
 






 
With a bit of luck this time Dad won't follow it up with a caning but today he can't help feeling his luck might just be running out!










TO BE CONTINUED



New Sting Lad Chris Jansen







Links are provided below out of respect for Sting's intellectual property rights


*
*
*


17 comments:

  1. I got castigated the other day for daring to make a comment regarding Stings sets and Bruce wrote a rather long very defensive reply to my comment. I also got told locations werent important to which I strongly disagree.

    Let me first say I am a fan of Sting and I love their work, however it appears lately that there is no effort being put into their sets at all. I highlight this scene and in particular this set:

    https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-QrSdsTNACoU/WCcINgImXlI/AAAAAAABAjo/vNNdqqJaV1QEEl4l4gaDQl7OPmC80BM_gCLcB/s1600/27b.jpg

    It's dreadful, and looks so cheap and tacky. An army bed held together with some plastic ties, and a desk table... thats it. Absolutely no effort at all was made to make this look like a teenagers bedroom. I can't actually believe that this is a Stng video its that bad. There used to be a time when Sting were the masters and their sets were unrivaled in the spanking world. Now it looks like they have a budget of £5 to build a set with.. It can't be that hard to borrow a friends bedroom to film a scene in, almost every other studio on here seems to be able to.

    Sorry for the long comment but its so disheartening to see a once great studio going so downhill. The spanking as always is first class, but the locations... well ... I think the photo above highlights the point Im trying to make. C'mon Sting what happened to you?


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry friend but are you for real?

      Are you working for a rival studio?

      Delete
    2. I will say this unlike other studios Sting use expensive equipment not just a handheld camera so it's not just as easy as packing it in a backpack and going into someone else's house I would imagine.

      Delete
    3. Well there are some scenes where they have shot in someones house, so it appears they are able to... but then again it can't be that expensive to get a secondhand bed and a few bits of furniture can it?

      Delete
    4. I honestly can't see why it matters, so I'd be grateful if you'd explain this. Does anyone else find the sets spoil their enjoyment (or otherwise) of the videos?

      Delete
    5. Yes if a set looks really nasty and cheap it puts me off buying. Its not that it spoils my enjoyment of the video, its more that if something looks cheap then it makes me question why should I buy it.

      Delete
    6. @ anonymous, in answer to your question yes it matters. If you were looking for a jacket and you walked past a shop and it looked cheap and grubby would you go in? Likewise if one is buying a video and the location/set looks bad, one would be put off from buying it. I think the comment by Barry D is slightly harsh but I do see his point of view, and I must agree that this particular set is not up to Stings usual standard.

      Delete
    7. It depends on whether there's something in the window I really want. For me, it's how authentic the location feels, rather than its expense. A bedroom might be quite 'cheap,' but still feel authentic, but a hotel bedroom is going to struggle (again, for me) to come across as a headmaster's study, for instance. So long as a set feels authentic, though, reusing it doesn't make any difference to me.

      Delete
  2. Sting are finding some hot guys these days, I would really like to see Luke back too - please!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I looked at that photo and I do not see anything objectionable with the use of cable ties on the bed. If anything it actually adds to the realism. The boy's parents are poor and they can't afford to buy new furniture every time he breaks something. You learn to make do. A typical young man's room could indeed look just like that. Besides, the condition of his bottom draws your attention away from the bed anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think it is totally and utterly unfair to single Sting and target them in this way. It is also very misleading to suggest that other studios do anything different. For instance Spanking Central is an excellent spanking Studio, however, they do not have “realistic” sets , and they do not seek to.

    Like Sting, they have a studio which is used like a stage to provide suitable backdrops for the differing activity. It costs a damn lot to maintain a studio, and it would be a waste not to use it, not to mention adding costs which would eventually have to be reflected in the cost of the videos.

    I can also think of a couple of other popular studios where 90% of the action takes place in various corners of a small flat. I don't see anyone winging about them, so why is Sting being singled out n this way?

    They are making spanking videos, featuring guys getting spanked, and are, without question the best spanking studio around. They do not pretend to be a Habitat catalogue

    Angry Dads 12 is a fantastic video, featuring great looking guys getting very realistic spankings, that is what we should be talking about.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Rubin, no one is singling Sting out, and nor was my comment intended to bash Sting, who as I said in my first comment (if you take the time to read it) I referred to them as the "Masters" of spanking and I praised the action in this video, so please dont try and paint it that Sting are being targeted.

    The basis of my comment was that Sting appear to not be putting effort into their sets anymore. As I said before there was a time when Sting were perfectionists and their sets were unrivalled in the spanking world. The action, the boys, the sets were all top notch and no one could touch them.

    Now it appears that their sets are becoming more and more boring and looking very cheap. Surely that doesnt benefit them? Remember we as customers know how good Sting are but any new potential customers would take one look at that bedroom set and think "geez what a crappy looking set" and look elsewhere. And yes people do do that, we buy based on visual impulses so I think having a set that looks nice, fresh and good is important.

    Obviously my comment has hit and nerve and everyone has gone really defensive about Sting, but surely better sets is better right? Maybe my point is lost.... but would be nice to hear Stings view.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think everyone has now expressed a view on what I suspect most will view as a peripheral issue, so I would be grateful if commentators would now focus on other subjects.

      As I understand it, most of the studios who's work is featured on JockSpank read the comments here and are aware of what is being said.

      In this instance, Sting have been offered the chance to respond, however, they feel that doing so would compromise JockSpank's independence.

      However, I understand that plans are in place, which should please most of their fans, however, this may take a while to implement.

      In the meantime can we please now move on.

      Delete
  6. Barry what is that rant all about! Yes I saw you were on Feel The Sting with my other comment and they graciously accepted your comments there too.
    You have to accept that some people are not going to agree with you. Sting don't get it right all the time but they are not 'once' great they are great and will remain so. They don't ever claim this but I as a long time customer feel its a fact as do many others. I can only assume there is another agenda here.
    Mate you only have to go through this very blog, tell me which other studio has all these different sets you talk about? Blanchette can't have bought many videos this year! Lots of bare coloured walls, curtains, oh and an army set that looks like its in a front room. Take a look at Sting's army set from a couple of weeks back just packed with military equipment and nice authentic kit! I really like what the other studios do too but please stop looking at beds and nit pickin get with the action which is always hot hot hot!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree there is a good amount of props.

      Delete
    2. It cost a lot to look this cheap - Dolly Parton.

      Delete